It's time for courts and parties to

Ask About TPLF

An Initiative of Lawyers for Civil Justice

Sign up for email updates below:

Ask About TPLF is an Initiative of Lawyers for Civil Justice

Why Ask About TPLF?

Courts and parties to civil litigation must Ask About TPLF in order to know who is controlling decisions in the courtroom, avoid conflicts of interest and disruptions to the legal process, and comply with basic procedural rules. Today banks, Wall Street hedge funds, foreign sovereign wealth funds and other entities invest secretive third-party funding in lawsuits and have more than $15 billion in assets dedicated to U.S. civil litigation — betting that they can earn big returns from large legal judgments and settlements.

What is TPLF?

Third-party litigation funding (TPLF) occurs when a person or entity that is not a party to a legal case invests money with the goal of reaping large profits contingent upon the outcome of the case.

TPLF occurs in many types of cases and comes in different forms, but the goal is always the same: netting a big financial return from the litigation of someone else’s claim. Indeed, third-party funders not only make money by buying an interest in a plaintiff’s recovery, but also may require repayment of their investment at predatory interest rates.

The Problems with TPLF: The 6 C's

Without disclosure of third-party litigation funding (TPLF), courts and parties have no way to know if such funding could impact their litigation and are prevented from appropriately utilizing several FRCP provisions and witness safeguards. For instance, courts and parties:

  • do not know if a non-party has control or undue influence over litigation and settlement decisions;
  • do not know if there are conflicts of interest with the undisclosed funder;
  • are unable to understand the resources of the party in making cost determinations, including decisions relating to proportionality of discovery requests and cost–allocation decisions;
  • are forced to engage in ad hoc procedures to make TPLF-related determinations which inherently lack consistency, predictability, and are often not correct (ex parte conversations about TPLF, without disclosure to all parties, is not an effective or appropriate process for determining the meaning of contracts that could affect all parties to a case);
  • do not know who – including non-parties — may have access to private and proprietary information whose confidentiality should be ensured via protective orders;

Solutions

Third-party litigation funding is a loophole at the intersection of two of the most regulated sectors of our society — the financial services industry and our legal system — because TPLF itself is completely unregulated and permitted to operate in the shadows despite conflicts, issues of control, and other disruptions to the legal process. Although judges have inherent authority to Ask About TPLF in their cases, a rule is needed to ensure that the process for disclosure is straightforward and consistent across all federal civil cases rather than having courts decide the process case by case. Judges also need to know how to Ask About TPLF to ensure that responses from parties are truthful and fulsome given the complexity of many funding arrangements. The federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules formed a subcommittee in October 2024 to examine the role of TPLF in federal courts.

TPLF in the News

October 16, 2024

Fortress’ Billions Quietly Power America’s Biggest Legal Fights

Bloomberg Law

By Emily Siegel

October 10, 2024

US judicial panel to examine litigation finance disclosure

Reuters

By Nate Raymond

October 10, 2024

Litigation funder backs cases over NJ law shielding info on judges, officials

Reuters

By Nate Raymond

October 10, 2024

Inventors Group to U.S. Courts Committee: Don’t be Duped by Corporate Call for Litigation Funding Transparency 

IP Watchdog

By Eileen McDermott

Contribute to our TPLF Resource Center

Help us build a comprehensive resource on third-party litigation funding! Click below to submit legal motions, decisions, and opinions, relating to TPLF.

Contact Us